[CAUT] Agraffes and dampers

David M. Porritt dporritt at smu.edu
Tue May 15 17:37:21 MDT 2007


Extremely well put!  Thank you Charles!

 

dp

 

____________________

David M. Porritt, RPT

dporritt at smu.edu

  _____  

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of
Charles K. Ball
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 2:24 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Agraffes and dampers

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

There is an excellent text called The Well-Prepared Piano, by Richard Bunger
(The Colorado College Music Press, 1973), which offers many helpful
instructions for performers.  Actually, it is the player who often needs the
most "preparation".

 

After a couple of generations of so-called "Extended Techniques", I have
concluded that these practices are here to stay.  At one time I took a
prophylactic and obstructive approach to this type of music making.  It
didn't seem to help much.  I also denigrated this type of music making,
which also seemed to be counter-productive.  The students and faculty simply
ignored and circumvented the piano technicians.  Several years ago I decided
to take a different approach, and give training and support to the students
and faculty.  I have been invited to speak to our composer's forum, and have
frequently worked with individual students who had to do preparation for
their recitals.  I would now estimate that 80% or 90% of those who need to
perform these practices come to me first for guidance, and sometimes for
mutes and screws and bolts.  At UT we do not have dedicated instruments for
extended techniques, and cosmetic or other damages are rare indeed.  In
general, I would have to say that the University Technician will have a
happier career if they love music, are dedicated to musical education, and
cultivate a collaborative, rather than an adversarial, relationship with the
faculty and students. 

 

It is not appropriate for us to officially pass judgment about the value of
different kinds of music making and performance.  It is our job to support
performance and instruction and to repair the damage--and to point out any
unfortunate consequences, preferably in advance.  Even traditional
performance practices take a toll on instruments, and it is very difficult
to keep institutional instruments in pristine condition at all times.  It is
frustrating when damage does occur, and I have produced more than my share
of tantrums and angry memos over the past 40 years, but we do have to remind
ourselves that institutional pianos are somewhat like a NY taxicab, compared
to a home piano, and have a limited life span.

 

Regards,

Charles

 

I'm sorry. I must disagree to some point.

 

Performers seem to be of the opinion that the composers of this music are
more the authority of piano design than are manufacturers and technicians.

 

Fuddy-duddie or not, there must be some education that much of this stuff is
quite damaging to the piano. Some of it doesn't even make sense - like using
a wedge mute for single unisons -- even the largest ones just fall through
to the soundboard. I don't care how much some of you respect some of the
composers or how "cool" some of that music sounds, it is my opinion that
those who compose this type of stuff are guilty of negligent vandalism, if
there is such a thing. When some music departments require some form of this
stuff for composition students to graduate, so that framming on a $100,000
piano with a beer can is all one can come up with to meet the requirement,
there are serious problems with this form of composition.

 

Jeff

 

 

On May 15, 2007, at 11:55 AM, reggaepass at aol.com wrote:





Hi List,

 

David has made a crucial point about how we are perceived within the
environment in which we work, and how that impacts how respected we are (or
are not). Taking an, "Ours not to reason why; ours but to do or die"
attitude (at least publicly), helps keep us from eroding our own
credibility.

 

Alan Eder

 

P. S. David, thanks for the endorsement of our video. It IS in the libraries
of many schools of music across the land and, apparently, has helped
facilitate the dialogue that must take place between pianists and
technicians about specific pieces and techniques. You check is in the mail!

 

ae

 

-----Original Message-----

From: dporritt at mail.smu.edu

To: caut at ptg.org

Sent: Tue, 15 May 2007 8:36 AM

Subject: Re: [CAUT] Agraffes and dampers

 

Paul:

 

 

Get Alan Eder's video of how to prepare a piano. It's good, comprehensive
and should be in every university's library. We have a resident ensemble
that only does contemporary music and naturally they prepare pianos a lot.
I've never had any real damage in the 21 years I've been here. This can be
done carefully, without damage and expands the range of piano music. When we
disparage this it makes us sound like fuddy-duddies who are out of touch
with life in the 21st century.

 

 

dp

 

 

David M. Porritt

 

dporritt at smu.edu

 

 

________________________________________________________________________

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at AOL.com.

=0

 

 

 

Jeff Tanner, RPT

Piano Technician

School of Music

University of South Carolina

Columbia, SC 29208

(803) 777-4392

 

 

-- 

Charles Ball, RPT
Head Piano Technician
School of Music
University of Texas at Austin
512-471-0763
mailto:ckball at mail.utexas.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070515/6b0f9bcb/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC