Hi Keith Ok, now I see where you are comming from. You simply say the output arm is the jack pin and therefore a fixed length, and further the jacks angle supporting whatever load is on it doesnt really figure into the equation. I think its fair to say the huge majority of things written up to now on the subject of the whippen disagrees. Fair enough...they may in the end be wrong and you right. I believe tho there are a couple points you are overlooking that I dont think you correctly can overlook. One, the position of the output load vs the output arm support point are changed relative to each other. Whether you think in terms of the jack top or the jack pin... this still effectively changes the ratio in the sense Jon points to... i.e. lengthening the output arm. Its just that you transfer the responsibility for the change to the hammer shank. The other is that I am unconvinced you can get away with discounting the jacks angle as you do. Still, its an interesting idea and it will be fun to look at closer with action models. One quick experiment would be to chop off the rep lever and fashion the rep spring so that it still works the jack return. Then adjust jack angle and reposition the hammer shank so the knuckle matches instead of the usual other way around. That way one could use BW measurements to look a bit closer at whether the angle of the jack itself actually does make a diff. Even tho BW measurements are rather iffy things ... it might be illustrative. Cheers RicB On 11/1/07, Richard Brekne <ricb at pianostemmer.no> wrote: > > Either way moving > the whole whippen 2 mm moves both points 2 mm. This is where I think you are missing it. The jack center to wippen center cannot change in distance. The RA remains the same length. 1 to 1.477changes to 1 to 1.430 with a 2mm rail move on the S&S wippen I just measured. It can lift more weight. Not much but some. If you lean the post or the jack from the tangent line of the RA, you have to use vector analysis and angular momentum formulas to figure the output transfered to the jack. It is not a distance measurment factored back directly against the EA. As the jack leans it is an exponential function based on the number of degrees the jack rotates. In other words from 0* to 30* there is not much change in force then from 30 to 60* it decreases rapidily and from 60* to 90* force is about 0. As it is I have a lot more to think about and detail, thank you and I will get back as soon as I can. Keith
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC