Hi Jeannie!
Good to hear from you!
That's an interesting observation on the cheapie vs. fancy-schmancy. Maybe
that "relative-relative" reading is all that I need. I still don't
understand why that one particular room feels so muggy, yet doesn't
register high on the hygrometer. Maybe I have a lemon?
Best,
Paul
"Jeannie Grassi" <jcgrassi at earthlink.net>
Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org
11/15/2007 09:23 PM
Please respond to
College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org>
To
"'Ed Sutton'" <ed440 at mindspring.com>, "'College and University
Technicians'" <caut at ptg.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [CAUT] Hygrometers
Hi Ed, Paul, et al,
I recently bought one of the “Professional” hygrometers from Pianotek
because I had heard the same comments from several other people. Well,
for the past two months I’ve been using it side by side along with a
Dampp-chaser hygrometer a/o ones that my clients happen to be using. I’d
like to say that the small difference in RH that it reads hardly amounts
to anything. AND……it takes quite a while (like five minutes) to settle
down and give an accurate reading from what it registered in my case, in
my car, traveling from the last appointment.
At first I would smugly take a reading off of it immediately and was
surprised at what a different result it gave from what was in the piano. I
congratulated myself on upgrading my tool and being a true “professional.
However, one time I just let it sit there while I was tuning and noticed
how much it changed until it ended up with almost the same as the one in
the piano. I observe this every day now. And I’m asking myself why I
spent all of that extra money. One client proudly showed me his
thermo-hygrometer (with memory) that he bought at Walmart for $6. It read
the same as my fancy-schmancy “professional” one.
Comments? ;>)
jeannie
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ed
Sutton
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 3:05 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Hygrometers
How about the "Professional" meter that Pianotek sells?
I like it because it reads quickly and reads lower RH than the Radio Shack
types.
I haven't compared it to a sling psychrometer. The sling psychrometers I
have found were rather expensive.
Ed Sutton
----- Original Message -----
From: John Musselwhite
To: College and University Technicians
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Hygrometers
At 12:42 PM 11/15/07, Paul wrote:
Hi List,
I have a couple of those cheap max-min thermo-hygro readers from
Pianotek. I'm not sure if they're very accurate.
They're more accurate than the Radio Shack ones, but I don't think by
much.
If you all remember, last fall/winter I sent in some photos of one of our
recital rooms that Richard West took before I got here with the fog and
water dripping all over everything. It hasn't been that bad since I've
been here, but the last couple of times I've gone in there this past week,
it feels really muggy, but the hygrometer only registers 40-45% (which
would be ideal). Any suggestions on who makes a real accurate reader?
We have the opposite problem here where Rh can be down into the single
digits in mid-winter. None of the "standard" humidity gauges go down that
far. I use a Cooper Digital Psychrometer much like the one down the page
at http://www.techinstrument.com/acatalog/Hygrometers__RH___humidity_.html
(SAMJR995). It's a digital version of a "sling psychrometer", the
wet/dry bulb unit we use to make truly accurate RH readings. While it's
supposedly accurate +-5% it still reads down to zero Rh which in worst
case might actually be 5%. I've read as low as 3% in mid-winter here in
some churches. In those pianos with DC's installed, sticking it under the
rim for a minute and pressing the "hold" button shows it's in the 40-43%
range at the soundboard even with extremely low humidities outside the
instrument.
I also have a USB recording hygrometer that will track the RH and temp
over a long period of time. It's at
http://www.measurementcomputing.com/cbicatalog/USB-502.asp?dept_id=414&pf_id=1759
. It reads very much like the "standard" units and differs from the
Psychrometer's readings. I trust the Cooper more for truly accurate
readings.
John
-------------------------------
John Musselwhite, RPT - Registered Piano Technician
Musselwhite Piano Services - Calgary, Alberta Canada
Office/cel (403) 246-7717 Fax (403) 255-5268
Outside of Calgary call Toll Free: 1-866-95-PIANO (1-866-957-4266)
"Three Generations of Experience"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20071116/d9dc3e0b/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC