[CAUT] electronic tuning device preference?

Don pianotuna at accesscomm.ca
Sun Mar 16 19:25:15 MST 2008


Hi Susan,

At least two ETD's have been able to reach the level you speak of.

The modified Hale Sight-O-Tuner could measure to 1/100 of one cent. RCT can
also "read" to 1/100 of a cent. Perhaps someone else can speak about
Tunelab and Verituner?

It would appear that the best that can be done on a totally "Aural" basis
is 1/10 of a cent. No one told me that such small changes were hard to
make--so I simply bashed away until I could make that sort of resolution. I
guess this would be a case of an ETD driving a student to a higher level
than they might have achieved without one.

Where our ears "shine" is in unisons. It is possible to duplicate a great
unison with an etd--just that it takes longer than doing it aurally.
Besides which the ear ought to be the final judge of what is desireable.

At 04:25 PM 3/16/2008 -0700, you wrote:
>
>One adjusts to that in various ways. I also present to you the idea 
>that there is a line between reasonable and unnecessary accuracy, and 
>the machines are well past the line. If a machine were invented which 
>allowed one to measure a note to a hundredth of a cent, some turkey 
>would probably think he had to work to that level.
>
>I think that aural tuning allows for a more natural judgment of which 
>aspects of tuning and voicing really make a difference to performers 
>and listeners, as opposed to those which are just easiest to measure. 
>But then, I am biased ...
>
>Susan Kline
Regards,
Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat

mailto:pianotuna at yahoo.com	http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/

3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
306-539-0716 or 1-888-29t-uner


More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC