[CAUT] Protek against string falseness

Jim Busby jim_busby at byu.edu
Thu Sep 11 16:12:20 MDT 2008


Ric,

When you say "Protek" is it the CLP or the Prolube? Or does it even matter?

Thanks,
jim

-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Richard Brekne
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:03 PM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: [CAUT] Protek against string falseness

Hi Ted

Yes.  After so many years in the biz one gets to know a wild bass string
that isnt going to respond to removal, twisting, cleaning what not with
reasonable assuredness. Tho that said... I had done a bit of that on
some of the strings I've applied Protek on without that having any real
affect.

Sometimes you can add a twist and it might help a bit... true enough.
But this seems to directly affect the para inharmonicity of a bass string.

What else it does is what I am looking for input on.  As well as what
effect protek has on bridge wood at the bridge pin.

Cheers
RicB

    Hi Ric,

    I sounds like you are not livening the bass strings first, is that
    right? You are not removing an end and running a loose granny knot
    back and forth to clean and "liven" the string? You are just adding
    the Protek to the string in its existing condition?

    Thanks.

    Ted

    Ted Kidwell, RPT





More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC