Linda, i treat technical details as proprietary knowledge. I apologize if somebody feels offended because of that. Bernhard Stopper Am 04.03.2009 um 10:32 schrieb Linda Stråhle: > While you are posting here on this list Bernard, why don´t you give > more information about your product and how it works. > It would stop us from guessing. I am insterested in buying it just > mainly because I have an iphone and it would be nice to have a > tuning program on the device, but I need to know more about it. > > What does it do? Is it listening to multipartials like the Verituner > or only one at a time like Tune-lab? To start with.. > > hälsningar, > > Linda Stråhle > > > > > > 4 mar 2009 kl. 07.42 skrev Bernhard Stopper: > > The statement in Kent´s article that can be easily misinterpeted if > taken out separately from the article: > "Stopper claims that PureTuner in effect does not care about > inharmonicity" > This statement is true in the one and only sense, that the user must > not evaluate the individual inharmonicity curve before the tuning > process. > > The correct standalone-possible statement about inharmonicity > treatment of PureTuner software Kent gave also, expresses the direct > opposite (you probably read the article?): > "Stopper claims that PureTuner deals with inharmonicity in a new way > that is automatic" > > Bernhard Stopper > > Am 03.03.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Richard Brekne: >> ..... and if you stop and think about the consequences of not >> compensating for individual instrument inharmonicity you will >> quickly see that that claim cant hold water either. In fact Kent >> quotes Stopper saying exactly that. >> > > > Linda Stråhle > linda.strahle at mhm.lu.se > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090304/42ec385b/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC