[CAUT] professor tuning variables

reggaepass at aol.com reggaepass at aol.com
Sat Mar 7 10:55:18 PST 2009


Hi Fred,



Can I get a discount for an advance, quantity order of your yet-to-be-released work on this subject?  Seriously, please consider writing for publication, either by yourself or in collaboration with someone else as up-to-date on the available scholarship concerning temperaments.  (Or we could go with plan "B" and just compile excerpts from the last few months of CAUT posts on related matters: The subject would be temperaments, but it would read like the "point/counterpoint" of a talk show, transcribed <G>.)




Alan Eder

  It is really high time we clear the underbrush away, remove the excess and misleading verbiage, and make this part of the profession more accessible, and better founded on actual, reliable scholarship. 

Regards, 

Fred Sturm 

University of New Mexico 

fssturm at unm.edu 
 



-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Sturm <fssturm at unm.edu>
To: caut at ptg.org
Sent: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: [CAUT] professor tuning variables







On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Fred Sturm wrote: 
 

>   I think this notion is the result of Mr. Jorgensen's work 
 


   As long as I am criticizing Jorgensen, I should also mention that his work is largely to blame for what is in the "Historical tunings" menu of RCT (and much of Verituner - Verituner has a considerably expanded list, which is both good and bad. I suppose of SAT III and IV and perhaps Tunelab as well, though I don't know those platforms). Well, I g
uess the blame really lies with those who were impressed with the size and the name of his "Big Red" book, and thought it must be authoritative. 

   The problem being that there are all sorts of things that really shouldn't be there (little to no historical authenticity or practical applicability), and there are holes where basic things should be. Where is Werckmeister III in RCT? Not to be found. Instead we have things like "John Marsh 4/25 syntonic," "WIlliam Trans'ur" and both "theoretical" and "equal-beating" versions of "John Preston." These are worthy at most of being in an obscure footnote somewhere. 

   It is really high time we clear the underbrush away, remove the excess and misleading verbiage, and make this part of the profession more accessible, and better founded on actual, reliable scholarship. 

Regards, 

Fred Sturm 

University of New Mexico 

fssturm at unm.edu 
 

 



 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090307/bc01a7b0/attachment.html>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC