[CAUT] Steinway rebuilds

Edward Sambell esambell at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 14 13:20:38 MST 2011


None  whatever. A good rebuild is often better than new.

Ted Sambell





________________________________
From: Keith Roberts <keithspiano at gmail.com>
To: caut at ptg.org
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 1:57:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Steinway rebuilds

I wonder how many of those glorious sounding Ds had rebuilt bellies? Steinway 
gets the credit for the sound but many of you techs have rebuilt Ds and really 
they are what you like in a piano but does anybody in the audience know that? 
They hear a wonderful concert and the piano was a Steinway. Who gets credit for 
the sound? If the piano sounds bad, who gets credit for the sound? 



On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Mckeever, James I <mckeever at uwp.edu> wrote:

Thanks to everyone for the discussion of laminated soundboards, especially Del 
Fandrich.
>Now a question about Steinway soundboards.  A rebuilder once told me he prefers 
>not to replace Steinway soundboards, because a replacement never quite gives you 
>the “Steinway sound.”
>Any truth to it?
>Thanks,
>Jim McKeever


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20110214/b55059bd/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC