I just want to make sure I'm understanding your point before and if I comment. Are you saying that the current state-of-the-art expectations by the world's best concertizing pianists are governed by or reflected in the manufacturing practices of the Samick plant in Indonesia and further that it's largely the placebo effect that dictates how these same pianists make esthetic decisions about what tonal output captures and expresses the music that they choose to interpret? David Love www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ed Sutton Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 12:20 PM To: caut at ptg.org Subject: Re: [CAUT] Lacquered hammers Each year at NAMM I discover how much the world is not what it would be if I were in charge. Gradually I am learning that it is what it is, and that I need to respect that what exists is at least able to exist. People (including people in power at colleges) say many ignorant things about pianos, but years ago I realized that if everybody dumber than me got as smart as me, I'd be at the bottom percentile, not a thought that pleases me. People mostly repeat what they were told, so change is usually slow and capricious. Meanwhile, if you want to see pianos made according to more current technology, go to Indonesia and visit the Samick plant. They are already making bellies and cases (now called "tone bodies") for increasingly prestigious-named companies (who are rather secretive about it...wonder why?). And they own one third of Steinway. By the way, placebos do work, by reducing the stress hormones in the brain. What makes a placebo work better? Bigger, more colorful, more expensive, used by somebody famous, just plain belief, everybody knows it's good. These are from double-blind tests of sugar pills. Do you suppose it doesn't apply to pianists, piano dealers, and piano technicians? Truth is our brains can't keep up, and we got no choice but to keep huffing or drop out. Let me know when the world is fixed. Meanwhile, let me know if I'm being human, more or less. Ed Sutton > If nobody wants to play it, it won't get played, period. It will be a > failure, period. No matter how much of your life's blood you have given > to make it the best it can be (in your opinion). > Dragging the state of the art back to the stone age? Well, the state of > the art has to please the state of the art. Meaning the modern piano has > to please the modern pianist, and the concert piano has to please its > wide range of users. If the "state of the art" of piano redesign is > capable of doing that, it will be a resounding success. If not, not. > Are there examples of redesigned concert pianos that have met with > consensus success at their institutions? If so, those are the instruments > to examine to discover what portions of redesign are most fruitful. > (Redesign for the individual is a completely different animal). > > Regards, > Fred Sturm > fssturm at unm.edu > "Since everything is in our heads, we had better not lose them." Coco > Chanel >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC