[CAUT] Fwd: Steinway sound-Hammer weights

Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu
Wed Mar 2 15:11:00 MST 2011


On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Dale Erwin wrote:

> Usually I find that actions with good overall key/action ratios (ie  
> 5.5) are sabotaged with this kind of weight


	I would just note that the notion of 5.5 as a "good" action ratio is  
a pretty modern one, last 50 years, say. If we want to talk about  
pianos of the late 19th and early 20th century, often with reverent  
terms as a benchmark to emulate, we need to remember that 6:1, 7:1,  
8:1 are also "good" ratios. This is particularly true if we want to  
talk about the "good" felt of that time and the tone quality it  
produced. IOW, ratio, weight, and felt quality (density in particular)  
are all factors that need to be in sync with one another. (Leaving  
aside other concerns, like the belly design and scale, that obviously  
also come into play).
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
fssturm at unm.edu





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20110302/5e3eee7c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC