Fred writes; >If we cannot define rebuilding, how can we create a rebuilder classification? What rebuilding is depends on who is using the word, i.e., A technician often sees the need for various levels of rebuilding, from just restringing, to complete soundboard jobs, from filing hammers to complete action replacements. An average owner, in their home, perhaps with the 2.2 kids taking lessons, will look at anything over $1,000 as major work, and often consider their instrument to be "rebuilt". It is the duty of all technicians that care about the industry, trade, and future of pianos, to not only deliver clean, durable work; but, to also, EDUCATE, EDUCATE, EDUCATE!! The more knowledgable the customer base, the harder it becomes for poor work to sustain a poor technician. If the customers know enough, they will either improve their work, go elsewhere, or find another job. (OK, that last sentence shows a bit of idealism, but we have to trust Karma somewhere.) "What kind of soap was in that box?" Ed Foote ( Forgive me if I rave; this a.m. I saw a families 1928 Steinway L, that while being inherited, was "rebuilt". New pinblock, 5/0 pins, 15 in./lbs. torque. ???? Untunable. Splitting brass rails in the action, hammers resembled a drunken conga line , the dampers looked like a little bitty train wreck. There was no budget left to correct the damage, much sadness all around.................(:`(
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC