Hi David: Yes, you could do this, but it will make the 3rds more uneven and could make the single octaves narrow. My personal preference is to go the other way in order to have those lowest plain strings fit better with the double and triple octaves, even at the expense of widening the single octave. Also it helps to keep the 5ths from being too narrow. The main thing that it hurts is the minor 3rds and minor 6ths, but you can't fix it all. Jim Coleman, Sr. On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, David ilvedson wrote: > > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 14:48:52 -0500 (EST) > > To: pianotech@ptg.org > > From: Phil Bondi <tito@peganet.com> > > Subject: SAT users > > Reply-to: pianotech@ptg.org > > Which reminds...this has probably been discussed before but I > missed it. When the F is near wound strings and has a high > number can you read the first wound string and split the > difference for your F in the FAC number? Another words.. > 18.1 for Phil's F and the first wound string below is 9.1. The > difference is 9 so subtract 4.5 from the 18.1 to get 13.6 for > the F number? > > David ilvedson, RPT > Pacifica, CA > > > > ..just got done with a Baldwin Classic(665)..reminds me of the Hamilton > > except for one thing...the F of the FAC's was 18.1..it is the first plain > > wire..this seems kinda high for a new piano..the A and the C were both below > > 8.0.. > > > > ..any comments? > > > > > > > > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC