List, Jon, Wim, Me, Keith, and Susan ... This is an interesting controversy, and one that each must decide for him/herself. Probably there is no "correct" answer. It reflects our own personal life's values and agendas. I view these classic Steinways in different category from most pianos, along with the Stradivarius', Rembrandt's, Picasso's, etc - the classic art of our civilization. These were among the finest pianos ever built, and should be treated carefully. In my admittedly prejudiced opinion, the present owners are merely the temporary guardians, and mankind - the owner, of these treasures. They have the responsibilty to guard their value and condition. If unable to fulfill their responsibility as a guardian of an art treasure, they should relinquish their guardianship to another, more capable individual. Few would have trouble accepting this philosophy in the case of a classic painting or Stradivarius. From an historical perspective, this is a well accepted viewpoint. Susan, Keith, Jon, I could easily agree with you regarding an ordinary instrument. But, a Steinway is a special case. Some may notice a seeming contradiction in my position - replacing old whippens with new. I believe that it is correct to replace old, deteriorated parts with new ones of equal or better quality, in the same way classic paintings are carefully restored - with "new" paint. Regards, David McCord At 09:43 PM 8/12/98, you wrote: >List, Jon, Wim, David, Keith ... > >I have to agree with Jon and Keith on this one. To me "high standards" take >your customer's requirements into consideration every step of the way. If >the old parts can be made to work _well_, or even _as well as the customer >wishes_, they are definitely the best value for money, and failing to >explain this and to find out if they will be good enough I feel ignores >your customer's needs and wishes. > >Susan >------------------------------------------------- > >At 08:18 PM 8/12/98 -0700, Jon wrote: >>>...New parts are not always the answer. >>> >>>Jon Page >>>Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass. (jpage@capecod.net) >>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >>>I believe it is a mistake to allow your customers' requirements to define >>>your standards. If you want to climb the ladder in a craft business, set >>>high standards. >>> >>>David McCord >> >>I have to side with Jon on this one. Blanket or wholesale endorsement of >>replacement of parts is not always the appropriate course. >> >>As a crude example: It would make me kind of wonder if a dentist who >>discovers I have numerous cavities due to extreme neglect and use said, >>"Yank 'em all 'cause the teeth you were born with aren't worth it." I'd be >>very suspect of someone who recommended that course of correction until >>clear evidence was shown it would be in my best interest to let go of the >>"originals" I was born with. >> >>I'd like to keep what I got until it becomes absolutely necessary to >>replace. Once the originals are gone, there's no turning back. No less >>with fine pianos. >> >>My experience, >> >>Keith McGavern >>kam544@earthlink.net >>Registered Piano Technician >>Oklahoma Chapter 731 >>Piano Technicians Guild >>USA >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Susan Kline >P.O. Box 1651 >Philomath, OR 97370 >skline@proaxis.com > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC