Hi Richard and others: Typically the cents deviation of partials can be plotted on graph paper by setting up cents on the vertical axis and the Partial numbers squared on the horizontal axis. The curve you get will be a straight line slanting upward. Para-Inharmonicity is any deviation from that straight line. It usually manifests itself by showing the 2nd partial being sharper than the 3rd partial or any other anomaly. My best guess is that this is caused by board relationships. It is worse at the Tenor breaks on plain strings. I do not have a clue as to how to correct this other than changing the mass loading of the board or bridge. Because of this erratic behavior of lower numbered partials it is my belief that notes in this area should be tuned by higher partials which are more regular, not lower partials. I tuned a Janssen console today in which it was best to use the 4-2 matching partials going down into the upper Bass area. 6-3 matching was too wide. It would have been alright to tune by the 6th partials, but not 6-3 matching partials. With the new SAT III one can tune smoothly across the Tenor break on small pianos by decreasing the double octave stretch and still tune by the higher 6th partial. As one goes lower into the Bass the matching can be made closer to the 6-3 matching relationship. All of this can be adjusted on the fly. When tuning these kind of pianos strictly aurally, it is necessary to continually make compromise adjustments to keep as many things nearly in line as possible. There are trade-offs between keeping smooth 10ths, smooth octaves and smooth 5ths going across the break. Another neat thing about the SAT III is that one can change the stretch numbers on the fly without remeasuring in the normal way. Neat Huh? This facilitates tuning across the wound string break in the Tenor section. Jim Coleman, Sr. PS Here is an example of plotting inharmonicity in cents versus partial num. squared: x C x E N x T x S x 1 2 4 8 16 Partial No. If the Inharmonicity were plotted again partial number, the curve would swoop up like the upper surface of a trumpet bell. JWC On Sat, 15 Aug 1998, Richard Moody wrote: > > > ---------- > > From: Jim Coleman, Sr. <pianotoo@imap2.asu.edu> > > > > As far as I know there is only a small effect on the inharmonicity > caused > > by the terminations, but perhaps a little more by the impedance > matching, > > or I should say mis-matching of the soundboard and bridge assembly. > > Some call this para-inharmonicity. This can include the effects of > voicing. > > > > Jim Coleman, Sr. > > Can anything be done to ameliorate the mis-matching of soundboard and > bridge? How can technicians identify such a mis-match in pianos. It > would be interesting to hear more about the effects of voicing on this > para-inharmonicity. > > Richard Moody >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC