Hi Richard: No one has shown any evidence that the nodes of a piano string take up space thereby shortening the segments of the various partials. Here is where stiffness comes in. In a previous post I showed how thicker stiffer wire acts more like a vibrating rod. Thicker wire is harder to bend. I also showed that there is no bending at the nodes, but only pivoting. The bending takes place at the loops. It is the loops which cause sound. The loops show more rod like characteristics the shorter they are. Both thicker diameters and shorter lengths increase inharmonicity. The nodal influence is just an idea, a way of explaining inharmonicity. It is not a fact. Stiffness is resistance to bending. The nodes do not bend, they pivot. Tension of a string remains constant throughout the string. Each segment of a string is at the same tension. Tension and stiffness are the restoring forces which cause a string to quit vibrating. Stiffness causes the higher partials to die out sooner than the lower partials because stiffness has a greater affect upon the shorter higher partials. It is quite obvious that it is harder to bend a short piece of wire than it is to bend a longer piece of wire. If we could have a perfectly flexible wire, the partials would be true harmonics. Since we have shown previously that in tuning forks which have only stiffness as the restoring force (no tension) the second partial is way sharp. My A4 tuning fork has a second partial which is at F7 plus 31.9 cents. That is extreme inharmonicity. Piano strings have moderate inharmonicity (the second partial of A4 is only a little over 1 cent sharper than a true harmonic). In piano strings the affect of tension is far greater than the affect of stiffness, therefore there is only a small amount of inharmonicity compared to bars, rods or forks. My primary argument is that stiffness affects the loops, not the nodes since it is the loops which bend and are resisted by stiffness thereby causing inharmonicity. Violin strings, guitar strings String Bass strings Harpsichord strings etc. are much more flexible than piano strings and hence exhibit much less inharmonicity (ignoring the control of bowing). The Inharmonicity formulas which you showed in your last post do not completely describe what goes on in piano strings. For those who have the RCT, the Pianalyzer shows varying amounts of inharmonicity for different partials (especially for the lower order partials). Dean used standard formulas similar to the authorities cited in your post to calculate the inharmonicity constants derived from successive pairs of partials.. There are yet unknown factors which are needed to account for these variations. At least, these formulas get you in a good ballpark. Jim Coleman, Sr.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC