I know some tuners that are good, some not so good & some that cannot tune aurally at all. So, yes, the statement made does presume a lot. I find personally that when comparing a machine tuning with an aural one I found the aural more "sweet". Maybe the ETD tunings are "technically" more accurate but I personally will tune aurally when faced with a nice instrument and am not pressed for time. JMHO Regards, Greg Torres RptBob1@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 98-06-16 01:13:16 EDT, you write: > > << Aural tuning by far is more accurate where as ETD gets you close. >> > Dave: > > This presumes an awful lot. Are you saying that ALL aural tuners are > outstanding,excellent,competent, etc.,etc. Now we both know that is not > true,don't we? > > Bob Bergantino,RPT > South Euclid, Ohio
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC