RCT vs SAT III vs TuneLab

[Michiel van Loon]

Robert,
I believe that the reason that we hear so little of the Tunelab users, is
because they did not spend the $34 and feel a bit ashamed.
Or maybe people believe that a program that is for free, can't be as good as
a program that costs $1300.
At the moment I am still a Tunelab evaluator, as soon as I can afford a
mini-notebook I will register.

Michiel van Loon.
Meppel
Nederland

>Jim, and others who have not seen TuneLab,
>
>  Unlike either the RCT or the SAT III, you don't need to make
>a big commitment to try TuneLab.  It is available for free at my
>web site:
>
>   http://www.wwnet.net/~rscott
>
>If you have any computer with sound capability and Windows 95/98, even
>a desktop computer, you can try TuneLab.  If you don't like it, you
>have only lost an evening of playing with your computer.  If you do
>like it, you can continue to use it for free (provided you don't mind
>seeing "Unregistered Evaluation Version" at the top of the screen).
>Or you can pay $34 to register and get a password that results in
>a less guilt-inducing display.
>
>The current version is 2.2, which was released at the national
>convention.  If any of you have registered an older version, you
>can download the latest version and your registration is still good.
>
>I must confess that TuneLab does not come with a lot of hand-holding.
>The help files are complete, but also terse.  I am hoping that a
>user group well develop where experienced users will share their
>insights.
>
>Robert Scott
>Real-Time Specialties
>
>