No, Anderson & Co. decided to start numbering at #45,000 there first year possibly so it looked like they had built a lot of pianos? The Pierce Atlas is not to be taken as gospel folks...just a close approximation in general and very accurate with some manufacturers such as Steinway... David Ilvedson, RPT Date sent: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 15:38 -0500 From: "JPIESIK" <JPIESIK@arinc.com> To: "pianotech@ptg.org" <pianotech@ptg.org> Subject: Re[3]: Pierce Interpretation... Send reply to: pianotech@ptg.org > Jim, > > Using that logic, is it correct to assume that Anderson & Co. produced 45,000 > pianos in their first year, 1914? I'm also stumped. > > John Piesik, RPT > Oceanside, CA > > > > In a message dated 3/30/99 11:25:13 AM, you wrote: > > <<Jay, > > I have always thought that the 21400 was the first piano built in 1907 and > that 24100 was the first piano built in 1908. > > Tom>> > > Jay, Tom; > Just the thing to clear the cobwebs and quit working for a minute :-) > I had this same question and used the name of "Bord" as my reasoning as far as > the atlas goes. > The 9th edition lists Bord (by Pleyel) as being founded in 1840, it also > lists the serial No. 1, in 1840, the next listing is for 1845 where the serial > number rises to No. 1200. Now I took/take this to mean that "Bord" produced > one piano in 1840, so that was the last piano produced that year...right? If > that reasoning is correct than serial No. 1200 was the last piano produced in > 1845....right? > > So far, so good......but do the serial numbers reflect actual "units" > produced or just assigned serial numbers........ in other words if a unit is > destroyed in production, or is found to be totally unsuitable for sale, does > the serial number just switch to another unit? Or is that number just skipped > over? The plot thickens and I have no answer :-) > Jim Bryant (FL) > David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA ilvey@jps.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC