John writes: << is there a table of torque measurements, in inch pounds, for the tuning pins. i.e. too loose? loose? nice to tune? too tight? >> Greetings, This subject will probably generate quite a range of preferences, here is mine. 50 in/lbs = too loose to be trusted with anything 75 in/lbs = marginal torque, oughta be repinned or glue sized, depending on situ. 100 in/lbs= A comfortable time of moving pins around, with the right technique, a pin this tight will hold tuning under any level of pounding. 125 in/lbs = Where I like to see a new block about four weeks after the piano is strung. 150 in/lbs= the upper limit of what makes sense in any way, a new pin in the bass of a large piano, perhaps. I have just used a different pinning on the concert D at Vanderbilt. It needed a new block, and I copied Chris Robinson's approach. I used 1/0 X 2 1/2" pins from Piano Tek, and drilled the Steinway stock block with the C bit, (.242"). I moved up to the D bit (.246) for the top section. The block feels great. I have a consistant 120- 130 in/lbs throughout right now, with the top section down about 10 or 15 in/lbs. I tune this piano a lot, I want it to be very comfortable to work with, thus the 1/0 pins and the expectation of 100-110 in/lbs of torque within the year. I used Sanderson bass strings, and Mapes Gold series wire, new agraffes and new bridge pins in new notches. It sounds good. Regards, Ed Foote RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC