At 01:46 PM 11/29/2000 +0900, you wrote: >Perhaps "non-flaPPable" would be sufficient? Or do you think that would >be non-sufficient? Non-flappable would be quite sufficient. No, I don't think it would be INsufficient. >Sorry if this reply leaves any of you feeling non-plused. It doesn't even leave me feeling non-plussed. <grin> >Aargh! Looks like we need registered language technicians too . . . Heaven forbid! Susan >Susan Kline wrote: > > > > At 10:22 PM 11/28/2000 +0100, Richard wrote: > > > grin.. I am inflammable.. > > > > NO NO NO!!!! Flammable and inflammable are two of those > > inscrutable, illogical English words. They mean the same > > thing. We don't WANT you to burn up! > > > > You want to be NON-flammable!! > > > > Susan
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC