Open face vs. closed face pin blocks

larudee@pacbell.net larudee@pacbell.net
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:28:29 -0700


List,

Does anyone have any ideas about why so few manufacturers use open face pin
blocks?  Cost is a major factor, of course.  Leo Duricic of Bechstein says that it
takes a master craftsman 11 hours to fit a block in an open face plate vs. 3 for
the closed face.  However, precision robotic manufacturing techniques such as those
used by Yamaha and others should be capable of greatly narrowing that difference.

Leo also says that the closed type produces more power, which is why their concert
size instruments recently switched to that design.  I don't buy that.  Bechstein
invariably uses agraffes in the entire scale with open face blocks but is now using
a capo bar with the closed blocks in their concert instruments.  I think that this
a more likely factor in power production.  Bosendorfer, which pairs open face
blocks with a capo bar, agrees.

Are there any other performance or design considerations that might lead
manufacturers away from open face blocks?

Paul Larudee



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC