I'm not entirely certain but if I were to guess, fanning out the strings at the bridge would have an acoustical advantage in that the vibrative energy is being distributed to a wider area of the sound board. This may also provide a greater degree in soundboard flexibility. It would seem that there would also be a relationship somewhere between the fanned out pattern and scale design. Rob Goodale, RPT Las Vegas, NV Calin Tantareanu wrote: > Hello! > > Can anyone tell me please why in some (overstrung) pianos the bass bridge is > quite long, > (because the bass strings fan out, I mean, the space between the bass > strings > is wider at the bridge than at the agraffes), while in other pianos the bass > strings run parallel to eachother and the bass bridge is therefore shorter. > > Is there any advantage with one of the methods ot the other? > > Curiously, I've seen both types in similar Bechstein painos (both two meters > long, one from 1887, with the long bass bridge, one from 1904, with the > short bass bridge).
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC