Terry, Patrick, Ron N and list, I suspect that the phenomenon you are describing, is something I have discovered to be a symptom of acoustic trauma. As we get older we tend to require the tuning stretch to be more extreme to satisfy our ageing sense of pitch. When I was a young tuner in my early twenties, I used to do occasional work for the local Bösendorfer agent. This elderly man was a 'tuner technician' from a particularly old school. The man was seventy plus and the tuning skills which he may have once had, unfortunately had long since departed. Now this elderly gentleman had quite a large tuning clientele, and when he finally retired out the Sydney area many of his clients came to me for service (ie. of the piano variety). In almost every case, by C88, the pitch was pulled sharp to the E flat above the C88. 'Deaf as a post', he was. After four years in the tuning business I began to work for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. This brought me in contact with many concert artists (several of whom had practiced for many hours a day for many years). Some had clearly developed hearing damage and loss. As a technician, the amount of stretch we put in a piano will always be a matter of judgement (for the aural tuner at least), and I have on many occasions sought the opinion of the pianist as to their preferred stretch. I have noticed that pianists with greater hearing loss (over the years you get to know the symptoms) prefer more stretch in the extreme treble. This I believe, is also the reason why concert artists with hearing loss prefer pianos to be voiced much brighter than those younger players who are yet to lose their hearing. To accommodate this problem when I was doing a lot of concert tuning, when tuning for a pianist for the first time, I would try to listen to a couple of their Cd recordings and note their age also, to assess their possible hearing damage. Using this information, I would set the piano voicing to a suitable level, in an attempt to satisfy the performer. Thus, if the pianist was older and probably deafer, I would tend to delay voicing that piano which had got a little bright. Instead, I might just voice back a few of the brighter notes in the 'high traffic' areas to keep the voicing uniform, but maintain the overall level of brightness. On the other hand, if I was tuning for a young rising star, I might voice back the entire piano if it had got a little bright. After all, concert instruments require some voicing every month or two. It just seemed a good idea to time those service intervals, allowing the voicing level to rise and fall slightly, timing it to the schedule of the performers and their level of hearing loss. One thing's for sure, older piano technicians and orchestral players alike, are likely to be suffering from some considerable hearing loss, and will tend to prefer pianos which are stretched to the 'hilt' and voiced to simulate breaking glass. At forty seven I must be heading in that direction. Regards to all, Ron O -- _________________________ Website: http://www.overspianos.com.au Email: mailto:ron@overspianos.com.au _________________________
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC