Patrick Greene said: > I still use the C temp. I always wondered what you called the method I use. > I use that method, but a couple of my tuner friends have told me that it is > out dated and the A temp is better. I am worried that if I try to learn it > now, it will hinder my current tuning skills. What do you think? Patrick, if you don't mind me saying so,I seriously doubt that learning a new method will 'hinder' your tuning skills. In my opinion, you're in the same position as someone who wants to explore Historical Temperaments and all they've ever tuned was ET. Personally, I tune in 2 ET's, depending on the piano. If the piano is a poorly scaled spinet (i know..i know) or a small Grand (usually under 5'), then I tune in a A-A Temperament as opposed to F-F. Why?..because I feel I get a better sounding break area from tuning A-A. Is it measurable? Probably, but I have never bothered to measure it. I 'feel' the piano sounds better, so if I feel that way, then chances are it does. I don't know if one method is better than the next, or if one is 'outdated' as opposed to 'updated', but I thought we all(or most of us) agreed that it doesn't matter how you get there as long as you _do_ get there...right? If somebody were to hand me an 'inferior'! C fork and said 'tune this piano', it wouldn't bother me in the least..i would see it as a challenge to my abilities..and i'm confident enough to say that I would do a good job with it. The aurals checks are the same..they just happen to fall onto different notes. There are certain methods that have become more 'acceptable' to teach than others, but that doesn't make the others outdated in my opinion. I say explore..otherwise you'll never know. roo(k)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC