The original pins were only 2 1/4 inches with only 1"3/8ths of pin actually in the block. Open faced block inserts through top of plate(router job and fussy fitting) , so no extra pin height required to clear the plate. So if I use the same size pin I am safe with a 1"1/2 inch block. The only concern so far assume problems with cheating on pins depth but this is not the case. I can go with original size pins. I thought a potential problem would be reducing contact with the flange but the distance from the top of the block to the bottom of the flange is 1 1/2 inches. I'm not sure why they went with such a thick block except that they had insert cut outs into the plate, and wanted extra, so ordered thick stuff. But they did not take advantage of the depth with longer pins. Dave Newton Hunt wrote: > A thinner block will yield less pin / block contact area. Pi*D*H > where D=diameter and H=height. Consider the total amount of contact > area of the pin in the regular block and the amount in the thinner > block. Bear in mind you will have to use 1/2" shorter pins. Now > figure the % difference. > > Other than that, as long as you have the plate height set right, there > will be little difference. > > Newton
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC