excessive amounts of included text

Robert Goodale rrg@nevada.edu
Wed, 07 Mar 2001 13:26:02 -0700


Robert Scott wrote:

> Robert Goodale sarcastically remarked:
>
>  >Your right.  Allllllll that wasted bandwidth is inter fearing with napster
>  >downloads.  After all, text uses soooooooooo much space.
>
> The point is, Robert, that it is darned impolite to make everyone on the
> list sort through more junk than they have to.

Golly wingy dingy wizdoinger!!   It was SUPPOSED to be sarcastic, I was
kidding.  You've been tuning too many spinets!!  I've been on this list
continuously for over four years and it seems people are getting more and more
wound up.  Back in the "old" days we used to throw e-spit balls.  Besides, I
don't read every post on the list.  If there isn't at least some of the
original message attached to the repost I have no idea what the repost is
about.  This is particularly important since subjects tend to evolve into new
ones without anyone changing the subject line.  Put your feet up and enjoy a
nice vanilla ice cream cone.  One of those ones with the little chocolate chips
are particularly good.  <;-)

Rob Goodale, RPT
Las Vegas, NV



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC