SAT users poll

[John Ross]

Hi Terry,
I started with a SOT, then a SAT #162, which has been upgraded,
and I use as a spare. (But never needed)
The reasons I like the SATlll over the SATl or ll.
1) It does not have a RAM for housekeeping, it uses a chip that
does not require power to retain it's memory. So it is more
reliable.
2) Size
3) Autoswitch, I feel this is a saving of a few minutes per
piano.
4) Longer battery life. I like the battery life indicator.
5) I haven't used the exam feature, and can't talk anyone into an
historic tuning yet.
6) I have used the thing that allows you to alter the tuning +/-,
a few times.
I have never regretted the purchase.
Regards,
John M. Ross
Windsor, Nova Scotia.
John M. Ross
Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada
piano.tech@ns.sympatico.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "pianolover 88" <pianolover88@hotmail.com>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:55 AM
Subject: SAT users poll


> I'm very interested in hearing from SAT III users, and how you
rate the new
> SAT III either on its own, or vs. the SAT II. I've heard from a
fellow tech
> in my area (Los Angeles) who claims, or at least has heard from
other III
> users, that they are frought with problems; in fact I'm told
that one user
> was SO frustrated with his SAT III that he literally threw it
in the trash
> can!!
>
> I currently own a SAT II and have been very happy with its
performance, so
> before i totally commit to buying the new III i wanted to ask
actual users
> from our esteemed list! thanks.
>
> Terry Peterson
> Precision Piano Service
> Torrance, CA
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com
>
>