This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
I think the reason A=3D440 is considered "hallowed" is that =
supposedly most pianos built since 1917 or so are designed to be at that =
tension and should sound best at that tension. Granted, a beat or two =
(A=3D442), doesn't change the tension that much, and maybe 4 beats at =
A49 (A=3D444) doesn't either, but the more conservative among us =
probably don't want to push the limit of what the designer had in mind. =
Newer pianos can certainly "take it" -- they could probably "take" being =
a half or maybe even a whole step sharp, but would we be damaging the =
strings or soundboard or structural integrity? Probably, but maybe not. =
But why risk it? I doubt there's ever much call tune a piano sharper =
than A=3D444, and that's rare. If it's been sitting at 440 for years, =
I'd hesitate because the tuning would be unstable, not 'cause the piano =
couldn't take it (unless very old). But at 440, you match the musical =
world, at least pretty close -- radio, TV, record players, non-tunable =
instruments like vibes, xylophones, accordions, etc. The notion that =
higher pitch equals brighter tone bothers me, however. --David =
Nereson, RPT, Denver=20
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/26/56/d2/11/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC