This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I think the reason A=3D440 is considered "hallowed" is that = supposedly most pianos built since 1917 or so are designed to be at that = tension and should sound best at that tension. Granted, a beat or two = (A=3D442), doesn't change the tension that much, and maybe 4 beats at = A49 (A=3D444) doesn't either, but the more conservative among us = probably don't want to push the limit of what the designer had in mind. = Newer pianos can certainly "take it" -- they could probably "take" being = a half or maybe even a whole step sharp, but would we be damaging the = strings or soundboard or structural integrity? Probably, but maybe not. = But why risk it? I doubt there's ever much call tune a piano sharper = than A=3D444, and that's rare. If it's been sitting at 440 for years, = I'd hesitate because the tuning would be unstable, not 'cause the piano = couldn't take it (unless very old). But at 440, you match the musical = world, at least pretty close -- radio, TV, record players, non-tunable = instruments like vibes, xylophones, accordions, etc. The notion that = higher pitch equals brighter tone bothers me, however. --David = Nereson, RPT, Denver=20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/26/56/d2/11/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC