SAT vs. PT-100

[Farrell]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Yes, John is exactly right. I have used the Yamaha PT-100. It has a few =
tunings in it that are designed for a few Yamahas. No ability to modify. =
No ability to create new tuning. No nothing. IMHO you should eliminate =
the Yamaha PT-100 from your consideration if you are planning on tuning =
pianos.

Consider the SAT III, Tunelab and CyberTuner. I use the SAT III and =
highly recommend it. Check the archives for tons of info on it and the =
other two.

Terry Farrell
Piano Tuning & Service
Tampa, Florida
mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: John Ross=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 7:00 PM
  Subject: Re: SAT vs. PT-100


  Hi Greg,
  Buy the SAT. The Yamaha unit has some generic programs for some Yamaha =
models. I don't believe it has the ability to give you a custom tuning =
for a piano using something like the FAC program.
  Regards,
  John M. Ross
  Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada
  piano.tech@ns.sympatico.ca
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: GBOLES@AOL.COM=20
    To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
    Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:45 AM
    Subject: SAT vs. PT-100


    I am considering the purchase of either an SAT III or a Yamaha =
PT-100 II.=20
    What are the pros/cons and what would be your recommendation? I know =
this is=20
    a subjective question, but I would appreciate your input.=20

    Greg Boles=20
    Baton Rouge, LA=20

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/7d/1a/82/d8/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--