Grin... you were counted amoung those numbers even as I wrote the first words of that post Ron. I know where you stand... and I dont aggree at all. The issue is not, and has never been the end result. That, I am afraid, is too vague. The issue is and always will be one of human intellect. What other standards can their be for apraisal you ask. ?? One that includes the appraisee to demonstrate an understanding of the rational behind the physical task at hand. In my opinion, turning a blind eye to everything but the finished result is little better then a "the end justifies the means" rational. No offense meant whatsoever. Ron Nossaman wrote: > >... as long as significant numbers amoung our > >ranks hang on to concepts like "Its the end result that counts... > >not whether the tooner has a brain"... > >-- > >Richard Brekne > > Count me among that number, except for one thing. Brains or lack thereof > aren't measurable from the finished result, and aren't the issue in any > case. The issue is whether the job was done with enough skill and > competence to leave an adequate result, regardless of the brain power, fork > size, electronic aid(s), professional group or political affiliation(s), > age, gender, peer approval or credit rating. What other reasonable and > rational standard could there possibly be? > > Ron N -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC