Fw: Improving Projection..

[Farrell]

Hi Paul. I enjoy very much reading your posts, and have gained much from
them. But please include the original post (or at least enough to make sense
of it and understand its context) as it make it nearly impossible to figure
out what anyone is talking about without it. Thanks.  :-)

Terry Farrell
Piano Tuning & Service
Tampa, Florida
mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com

----- Original Message -----
From: <Yardarm103669107@AOL.COM>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Improving Projection..


> Dale:
> Take off your vest. My opinion coincides with yours. Without mentioning
> names, some high quality hammers from a high quality supplier are
> intrinsically too hard to be stable or stabilized for any length of time.
I
> would always rather work a hammer up than down. My opinion is that the
> hardening agent (read densifying or stiffening or whatever you wish),
> whatever creates a serious tensioned surface (a portion of a spring) is
> likely to be more stable over time. Not too large a generalization, I
think.
> PR-J
>

In a message dated 3/17/2001 1:30:48 PM Central Standard Time,
BobDavis88@AOL.COM writes:

<< and I don't remember what else. >>
Bob, one of them was an old standard upright hammer!
PR-J