----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Garrett" <joegarrett@earthlink.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: May 24, 2001 3:17 PM Subject: Re: New hammers for Hamilton school piano > Oh really Del, > And what part of your remanufacture/rebuild business uses ecsaine? Haven't > heard you espousing it's virtues before. Obviously, none of it. But, I remanufacture and rebuild pianos. I don't mass produce them. My needs along these lines are quite modest. If I were manufacturing even at the quantity Baldwin is currently producing I would probably be using the stuff. I'd also be looking into plastic action parts, laminated soundboards and a lot of other stuff I don't currently use in my piano remanufacturing business. If you haven't heard me espousing the virtues of these things, well, you haven't been on the list all that long. > And while we're at it how come you > didn't come to the rescue of the newer Hamilton's problems, seeing as how > it's your redesign, (according to a conversation we had a few years ago.):-) I only redesigned the piano, I don't build it. Why should I come to the rescue of a piano being sloppily built on an assembly line that was being pushed beyond anything it was designed to handle. Besides, the piano being built today is no longer the piano I redesigned. For just one example, I didn't specify the hammers that are in use today. As has already been pointed out several time on this list, that redesign was supposed to be a stop-gap until a new back and scale could be designed. Obviously, that never happened. Even so, go back to the piano as I redesigned it in the mid-80s, build it properly, and you'll have a piano that is still reasonably competitive with anything else in its size and price range. Regards, Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC