> Which brings us to the Nossaman enigma...i.e. what part(s) >of the rebuild/restring actually made the differences?? :-) > >Jim Bryant (FL) Yes, anything you can mention that can be done more than one way, or not done at all, will make some difference. I'm just hoping to help outline some sort of realistic priorities of importance for myself and the rest of the piano service folks out there to dispel some of the general smoke. It's not that holding one's tongue just so won't make a difference as one polishes the tops of tuning pins to clear up false beats, but time might be better spent on something else that will make a more detectable change. What service and rebuilding people need is, in my opinion, a much better overall understanding of how things work, why they don't when they don't, how to try to tell the difference, and a workable priority decision tree to determine where to best focus our attentions for best result with the least guesswork and false trails. We seem to be making some headway, but there are still plenty of swamps to drain. I'm kind of with Bill on this one. While I agree that solid bedding, mass, and rigidity is essential, I've also heard Steinways that didn't have the block attached to the spreader sounding much better than a lot that do. I'm sure it makes some difference, but I can't say how much since there are other factors lower down in the foundation that will make bigger differences - these factors being unaccounted for in the observations. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC