This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
The heavy use of sustain pedal while attack is very efficient at breaking
strings, that is why I thought of the unisson tuning reason (too much energy
since the attack)
Regards.
Isaac OLEG
-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-pianotech@ptg.org [mailto:owner-pianotech@ptg.org]De la part de
Wimblees@AOL.COM
Envoye : vendredi 5 avril 2002 20:46
A : pianotech@ptg.org
Objet : Re: Scale tension
In a message dated 4/5/02 11:29:12 AM Central Standard Time,
dm.porritt@verizon.net writes:
I think soft hammers break more strings than hard ones. Why?
Because the pianist wants a certain sound for the fff climax of the
piece. If the hammers are soft, he/she has to hit the keys harder.
Still not enough sound, hit them harder yet. Bang! It happens all
the time.
dave
I do agree that a pianist wants to hear a loud sound, and he will play
hard, but I don't think it is necessarily the condition of the hammers. The
same pianist who broke strings on his B, didn't break them on the D in the
concert hall, either before the concert when he practiced, and during the
concert. And he played the Rach 3, quite a loud and boisterous piece, to say
the least.
I think part of the problem is the playing technique. Some pianist have a
technique that will cause strings to break, regardless whether they are soft
or not. A very good jazz player in St. Louis had reputation of breaking
strings. It was something in his attacking the notes that caused strings to
break. A lot of fundamental churches break strings, because they constantly
play hard. So I don't think it is all related to the condition of hammers.
Wim
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/88/e0/fe/9c/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC