To Voice or Not to Voice? [was Re: Baldwin hammers]

Erwinspiano@AOL.COM Erwinspiano@AOL.COM
Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:30:23 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 8/10/2002 4:01:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
ray@bentley.net writes:


> Subj:Re: To Voice or Not to Voice? [was Re: Baldwin hammers] 
> Date:8/10/2002 4:01:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:ray@bentley.net">ray@bentley.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>         Ray

   Sorry. I guess I missed your point. To answer your first question my 
standard answer is, use  Ronsen with German felt. My point was often clients 
don't know the difference. Viva la difference!
>>>>>Dale
   

> 
> Dale, and others,
> 
> The client was specific in requesting that further voicing not be done.  It
> had a warm and full sound throughout.  Yes, the client is still ecstatic
> with the results now two years later.  As a matter of fact, recently she
> told me that is wonnnnnnnnnnnderful!
> 
> The original post asked for a suggestion for hammers that might require
> minimal voicing.  While I have had many other hammer replacements that
> required various amounts of voicing, this is the suggestion I offered.  
> This
> is not to be construed as my standard practice.
> 
> Respectfully,
> 
> 
> Ray T. Bentley, RPT
> Registered Piano Tuner-Technician
> Alton, IL
> ray@bentley.net
> www.ray.bentley.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Kdivad@AOL.COM>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 4:40 PM
> Subject: Re: To Voice or Not to Voice? [was Re: Baldwin hammers]
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/66/5e/54/6c/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC