Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes! Did I miss anything? Just was looking to see if some experience would agree with me. Thank you very much Wim. All that you mentioned will be exactly my approach. I also agree that I only assume that the piano will end up being junked and the her insurance company will buy her a new "cheepie" micro-grand. It would really be a shame to fix it because then you would have this small, but nice, belly (I hope!) but this horrid little aged action (looks pretty much all original). But I find it difficult to see this happening. Heck, maybe she will even prefer one of those new-fangled spit-shined pianos over her satin brown walnut Estey! Thanks for taking the time to respond Wim. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wimblees@AOL.COM> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:32 PM Subject: Re: Water Damage & Insurance > In a message dated 2/5/02 10:15:13 PM !!!First Boot!!!, > mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com writes: > > > > So, here finally is the question(s). She has a replacement-type policy, so > > she wants it fixed right. I need to provide her insurance company a cost > > estimate for soundboard replacement (obviously, the cost is going to exceed > > the value of the piano, which I would place around $3,000 - and will even > > likely exceed the cost of piano replacement (with one of similar quality). > > I guess one has to limit proposed repairs to that which may be caused by > > water damage. So we have soundboard. I suppose the bridge is not damaged > > (are we worried about the cap peeling off?). To get to the soundboard, we > > need to remove strings - ain't nobody gonna get me to put half-rusted plain > > wires back on, so new plain strings. What about the bass strings? They > > sound OK - like you would expect on such a piano - but not tubby. Do we > > propose to re-use the bass strings? What about the pinblock? Certainly > > restringing will cause some wear-and-tear to the pinblock. > > > > Any input would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > Terry Farrell > > > > > Terry > > When replacing the soundboard, you need to remove the plate. In order to get > the plate out, you need to remove the strings. All of them. Yes, you could > maybe save the bass strings, but to uncoil them, and have half of the break, > is not worth it. The labor to do that is not going to be less than buying a > new set of bass strings. Don't even mention the idea of using the old > strings. Just say that the strings need to be replaced. Period. > > The Pin block. Expect the same to happen to it as happen to the soundboard. > In other words, with a new soundboard comes a new pin block and new strings > and pins. You also need to add new damper felts, because the old ones will > probably have rust on them, if they are not hard from the humidity. I think > the only thing you could save are the bridges. > > The cost of doing all of this is going to far more than the value of the > piano. The cost of doing all of this might even be more expensive that buying > a new Samick grand, unless you can convince them the piano is equivalent to a > Weber, or even a Baldwin. In any case, if the cost of repairs exceeds the > cost of a new grand, (and they might be able to get wholesale), the insurance > company might give the customer the money for a new piano, and take her > piano. The problem is, it won't look like the old Estey. So she'll have to > negotiate that. > > Be sure to explain to the customer that anything less than what I just > mentioned will NOT put the piano back in the shape it was before the flood. > The insurance company might also try to find someone who will dry out the > piano, "fix" the soundboard, polish the strings, and give it a quick tuning. > But that won't repair the damage. So be firm about this. > > Good luck. > > Wim > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC