Wierd Pitch Raise Results

[Farrell]

> If you raised it 5 cents and it went up 15-20, I'd investigate rendering, 
> hammer technique, and test blows.

That's why I mentioned my success with others, but who knows. I suppose the bottom line is that with exceptions such as this, just don't worry about it. I mostly wondered if anyone else had noticed anything like this before.
  
> Did you enjoy the false beats in the treble, too?

False beats in the treble are a dime a dozen. It's the false beats in the tenor that are priceless! (Thanks for the humor, I needed that!)

Terry Farrell

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Susan Kline" <sckline@attbi.com>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: Wierd Pitch Raise Results


> At 11:50 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I also pitch raised a 1973 Kimball console today. The piano was all over 
> >the place tuning-wise, but was only about 5 to 10 cents flat on average. I 
> >made the small pitch offset correction as usual with the SAT, and after 
> >the pitch raise pass, the ugly son-&%-$-$#%&@ was a good 15 to 20 cents 
> >sharp. WHY? I went through it again without any pitch correction (the 
> >piano should have ended up perhaps 5 cents sharp) and every thing was like 
> >at least 10 cents sharp!
> 
> <grin>
> 
> If you raised it 5 cents and it went up 15-20, I'd investigate rendering, 
> hammer technique, and test blows.
> 
> Did you enjoy the false beats in the treble, too?
> 
> Susan
>