---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi folks.
This subject has been up from time to time with varying opinions about
its worth, and questions about whether or not factories use it, and
why. I like to try and ask people directly if I can, and I got this
back from one of the fellows at the research department at Petrof.
Thought you might like to hear what he had to say.
"Dear Richard
We are using EMA for piano design. Most of all we are
observing modal shapes
of soundboard with / without bridge in free conditions. We
have also
laboratory brass frame for fixed piano soundboard conditions
(can be seen in
our web bulletin No 01/2000). Ocassionally we make also EMA of
grand outer
rim. It can be helpfull for construction changes results
observing . For
instance comparing of modal shape amplitude between soundboard
and rim can
say something about acoustic efficiency of new prototype.
We made some works on computer modelling of piano soundboard
by FEM and
comparing Fem model modeshape results with real soundboards
from EMA. Some
results of my colleague work You can see at proceedings of
ISMA 1995 France,
Dourdan -
Alois Raffaj: Vibrations of piano soundboards, pg 373."
--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f5/85/92/15/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC