Hi Folks. We have been talking about whether a piano can "mature" and Richard brought up the point that scientific evidence of why or how this might happen seemed to be lacking. While perusing the "Wood Handbook - Wood as an Engineering Material" I ran across this on "creep and relaxation", which may or may not have something fundamental to do with the phenomenon. ________________________ "Creep and Relaxation When initially loaded, a wood member deforms elastically. If the load is maintained, additional time-dependent deformation occurs. This is called creep. Creep occurs at even very low stresses, and it will continue over a period of years. For sufficiently high stresses, failure eventually occurs. This failure phenomenon, called duration of load (or creep rupture), is discussed in the next section. At typical design levels and use environments, after several years the additional deformation caused by creep may approximately equal the initial, instantaneous elastic deformation. For illustration, a creep curve based on creep as a function of initial deflection (relative creep) at several stress levels is shown in Figure 421; creep is greater under higher stresses than under lower ones." (Wood Handbook - Wood as an Engineering Material p. 4-24) ________________________ If I'm interpreting this correctly, after a rim is bent or a lever is loaded additional time-dependent deformation in that rim (rim creep?) continues to occur long past the time the rim becomes part of the case, going on for at least several years until it settles in to being a rim. While this period isn't specified I imagine it is highly dependent on the species from which the "member" is made, the manner in which the parts are joined and the kinds of stresses involved in the parts. It goes on to say that any structural members under stress, which I would take to be the inner and outer rims, beams, bridges and soundboards and even the wooden action parts, would be subject to creep of some kind. According to the book, if the stresses are high enough over time "creep rupture" or failure will eventually occur. Stress cycles apparently decrease the time it takes for creep rupture to happen, and while total failure of most action parts is rare, the continuing cycle between a light load at rest and a heavy load as a note is being played would seem to make action parts vulnerable to this kind of stress failure as time goes on. The book also says that changes in climatic conditions increase the rate of creep and shorten the duration during which a member can support a given load. It doesn't specify the "climatic changes" required, but we know that pianos are shipped all over the world and in shipping can be subject to gross climate changes along the way. What effect will all this have on an instrument that was just lumber a relatively short time before? If the lumber came from the tropics does the climatic changes to the Northern Hemisphere after it is worked have a greater creep effect than lumber that comes from here? Furthermore, do different wood species "creep" differently when moved from one area of the world to another that's totally dissimilar? This raises other questions such as the effect this has on mass-produced pianos where the structural members are made from wood of the meranti group like lauan. While the book says it has structural properties favorable to Northern Red Oak and it's usually well-dried (a whole other related topic), could long-term climate-induced creep failure be part of the explanation of why people appear to think that Asian pianos don't last as long as a domestic instrument? Also, are domestic pianos made from domestic woods such as maple and spruce less affected here by the same kind creep failure while perhaps benefiting to some extent from the effects of creep itself as they mature? While maple rims and spruce beams appear to be structural overkill when lauan parts appear to perform well enough over the short term, do they seem to outlast the "select hardwood" because they're under less stress and tolerate long-term creep failure much better? To anthropomorphize this slightly, I would take all this to mean that according to the standard engineering reference source, at least for "a period of years" depending on the design, structural materials, execution and servicing, the longer a piano is a piano the more it wants to *be* a piano. This maturing process is complex, time dependent and could even be said to be somewhat "creepy" in nature. It is, to some extent, measurable and predictable, taking maturity in a piano from the philosophical realm of art and opinion and placing it within the world of science. For more details on this including charts, drawings and photos, please see the "Wood Handbook - Wood as an Engineering Material" previously mentioned here and available on the Internet. I encourage comments as to whether I've drawn the correct conclusions from it as to how this might affect pianos. Regards... John John Musselwhite, RPT - Calgary, Alberta Canada http://www.musselwhite.com http://canadianpianopage.com/calgary Pianotech IRC chats Tuesday and Thursday nights and Sunday Mornings http://www.bigfoot.com/~kmvander/ircpiano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC