Spring behavior

[Phillip Ford]

Sorry Isaac, I didn't understand your post.  Are you saying the Renner
whippens are good for the reason that Ed mentions (long term stability), or
the Renner whippens are not good for the reasons that I mentioned (noise and
repetition)?

Phil F

On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:29:54 +0200 Isaac OLEG <oleg-i@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> It is.. for all the points you mentioned
> 
> 
> 
> Isaac O Zoreil
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > 
> > 
> > >    The major benefit of the Renner whippens
> is
> > > that their teflon adjustment 
> > > screw provides a VERY long lasting spring
> > > regulation. ( I have numerous 
> > > actions at the school where the spring adj.
> has
> > > been stable for years).  
> > > Regards, 
> > > Ed Foote RPT 
> > 
> > Ed,
> > I much prefer this adjustment to the easing,
> warming, 
> > rubbing, bending,
> > mangling (choose your word) that serves for
> regulation of 
> > the Steinway style
> > spring.  But I don't have long term
> experience with these.  
> > I've heard that
> > some manufacturers (sorry, I don't remember
> brands and I 
> > don't remember the
> > source) had switched to these and then
> switched back for 
> > two reasons:
> > 1.  The teflon adjuster and wire interaction
> develops some 
> > noise over time.
> > 2.  Repetition is faster with the Steinway
> style spring 
> > than with the teflon
> > adjuster style.
> > 
> > Have you found either of these things to be
> the case?
> > 
> > Phil F
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > pianotech list info:
> https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> > 
>