Fw: Patent Notice

[Erwinspiano@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 10/29/2002 6:19:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
davidlovepianos@earthlink.net writes:


> Subj:Fw: Patent Notice 
> Date:10/29/2002 6:19:27 AM Pacific Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">davidlovepianos@earthlink.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>            David 

                    I wonder as well. With all due respect to Dave S. these 
"Stanwwoodized" ideas are not exactly new or completely original and much 
similar material has been out there but the information has certainly been 
organized and formulated into a cohesive format by Mr Stanwood. I suspect if 
you simply refrain from usage of terms to close to the patent material all is 
well. But how far can Dave S. take the argument in reality. To court? Dunn 
no.
      DAle Erwin

> 
> Received the following notice which I forward to the list.  I am curious
> about the protection of such patents under law that describe a relationship
> found in basic mechanics and, moreover, have been published in the public
> domain.
> 
> David Love
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b6/21/f7/69/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--