Musings Richard, I believe that's allowed. David Love ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: October 31, 2002 12:26 AM Subject: Patent Notice David Love wrote: > I think the post could have been interpreted a number of ways, and I, > myself, wasn't sure exactly what was meant. That's why I decided to read > the patent. > > David Love > Well,,, I dunno... seemed likes one clear sentence that directly addresses the issue of FW is pretty straightfoward. Even if it was accompanied by a couple more sentences to explain that he actually could have kept the whole of it secret and to himself. On the other hand, I gotta admit I got rather confused with your own lengthy blending of patent concerns and design preferences and prior knowledge issues. I'm still not sure what message you were trying to deliver in that mesh, but the ensuing discussions with renamed subjects are helping to clear all that up. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC