Kimball Whitney

[David Love]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
The question isn't whether to service it, it's whether to buy it.  If it =
were my customer, I would strongly recommend to not buy it.

David Love

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: SidewaysWell1713@aol.com=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: January 05, 2003 11:07 AM
  Subject: Re: Kimball Whitney


  In a message dated 1/5/03 12:36:31 PM Central Standard Time, =
tomtuner@attbi.com writes:



    List,
        Not to open a can of worms here, and I preface my comment by
    telling you I'm not a "digital keyboard" ,guy but even a low cost
    digital would be more productive for a beginner than a Whitney that =
is
    difficult to tune, has horrid stability problems , awful tone and an
    action that has poor performance at best. If there is a reason why
    Kimball is gone the Whitney may give a clue.Just my opinion .
        Tom Driscoll RPT



  Funny, I never had any of these problems.  Kimball is still in =
business and making a profit.  The Whitney piano will last longer than =
all of those on here who have condemned it.  If it were in my area, I'd =
treat it just as I would any other piano.  I might charge more for =
servicing than was paid for the piano but that's how I make my living, =
piano service, not trashing virtually every piano ever made.

  Bill Bremmer RPT
  Madison, Wisconsin
  Click here: -=3Dw w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =3D-=20

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/be/cc/2a/bf/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--