---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment How about n'overstrung. No hypen. No xtra sylABle. =20 n'overstrung. (what are the chances there's n'argument) ~(: >) Best, Rich On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Keith McGavern wrote: > At 8:41 PM +0200 6/8/03, Richard Brekne wrote: > > =A0 > > Delwin D Fandrich wrote: > > Or should we just use non-overstrung piano having all strings in a=20 > single, more-or-less-flat plane. Seems a bit cumbersome. I'll stick=20 > with flat strung. > > I propose a completely different term... one that I think clearly=20 > exhasperates upon us its reasonablness. > > > > Fanned Strung > > > Del, Richard, > > If it were a matter of establishing terminology to supposedly=20 > eliminate confusion in the piano industry, non-overstrung would simply=20= > be the best description, no ifs and or buts. It embraces all of the=20 > following: > > Straight strung > Flat strung > Fanned strung > > And other than comprising more syllables and a hyphen, it seems hardly=20= > less inconvenient to use. > > Keith McGavern > > (Straight strung works for me until Council decides otherwise=A0 :-) ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1385 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/88/dd/80/c7/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC