OT More Realistic Test was RE: tuning exam in U.S.

David M. Porritt dm.porritt@verizon.net
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 09:13:08 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
As it has been pointed out already, this discussion of PTG policy
should really be on the PTG-L list.

dave
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 6/28/2003 at 7:51 AM Tompiano@aol.com wrote:
Which brings me to the point I have been trying to make for years.
If the piano technology industry really wants to get serious about
increasing the amt. of Associates upgrading to RPT status they need
to implement the following:
l. The PTG would be point themselves in a much better direction if
they consider having a paid staff of CTEs  (say a yr. part time job
assignment) who would do nothing but give exams from state to state.
You would have more CTEs who would justify the amount of time needed,
plus the examiners would become more efficient at maximizing their
time. 
If they would have a rotational staff of 12 who agree to make
themselves available for so many dates and locations, a systematic
approach to offering the exam could begin taking place. CTEs would
justify their time because it wouldn't interfere (as much) within
their earning power.
2. Put a time limit on the grace period one could remain as an
associate, say 3 yrs.
After that point put up - or shut up.
3. Raise the exam fees to respectable levels associated with a
professional certification.  Let the fee reflect the importance of
the upgrade.
Obviously this would never fly as their would be a drastic drop in
membership and the Guild would probably end up shooting themselves in
the foot.  The Guild is far too fragile to make such a leap. But if
there were to be a drastic revamping of the current system, that
would be my call.
Point being, I think in the long run, you would have dictated a new
order of progressing up through the ranks. Then RPT status would have
some clout behind because it would be one the hurdles many would HAVE
to go through.
There are many ways to shoot holes this plan, but if you the industry
is ready to get serious, this is one of the possibilities they'll
have to consider..
Tom Servinsky, RPT
**************** END MESSAGE FROM Tompiano@aol.com
********************* 
_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b3/41/f7/b0/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC