At 9:20 AM +0200 5/12/03, Richard Brekne wrote:
>An important distinction to be sure. And... as long as you mentioned
>it... we could
>really get into just how the mass of the "bone" as it were... or the
>shank itself
>contributes to the whole thing. It has a resonance of its own, and how much it
>flex's is a determinant in how other factors contribute.
We talked about the flexing of the shank, but nobody had a clear idea
of how much of that was still present when the hammer hits the
string. You're right, higher SWs mean more shank flex.
>Do I understand you here to also be drawing up a distinction between
>adding leads to the core of the hammer vs just plain more hammer felt ?
Yes, the distinction becomes clearer when considering just the hammer
head itself. Felt = muscle, molding (with or w/out leads) = bone. (At
the risk of oversimplification......)
Cheers,
Bill Ballard RPT
NH Chapter, P.T.G.
"You'll make more money selling my advice than following it"
...........Steve Forbes, quoting his father, Malcom
+++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC