---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Isaac sur Noos wrote: > It is the phase we are after, after all, no doubt some circuitry is > able to check that - still I believe the delay time we have between > what we see and what we hear is in favour of the ear by ten times > (I've read that somewhere). Mind processing is faster for ear than > eyes and may be touch (?) > Sounds too me like the slightly out of tuned unison theory. In any case Tuning unisons, like tuning octaves and temperament have no single one descriptive that fits. What <<we>> are after varies from person to person quite a bit... even within the range of very high quality fine tunings. As far as the speed issue is concerned... in the end both ears and eyes can process the relevant information quite a hundred times faster then the arms and hands can carry out the resultant orders. This ETD / Ear thing always seems to bring out the emotional side of our reasoning on either side of the fence. Its easy to loose track of the probably fact that ETD's are hear to stay... and will continue to get better and better until at some point ear tuning will just become downright superfluous. We may loose some of the human creative aspects of our musical experiences... but the writing seems quite apparent and in large text on the proverbial wall. Cheers RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/0e/d1/28/ca/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC