---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 8/4/2004 10:55:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rnossaman@cox.net writes:
>
>
>David Love
I don't know who this was supposed to go to, but I think that if wishes
were fishes, we'd be swimming in sushi instead of BS.
"Functional for least cost" requires someone to make the determination of
(and take the responsibility for) what constitutes function, and what is
the least cost to obtain said function. If cost trumps function, the piano
is already a very good deal because all work not done on it is free. You
can't beat that, so go with it. I'd suggest they bask in the glow of zero
cash outlay function with what they have until they decide if it's worth
what it takes to meet their, and your, definition of function. Remember
Phyllis Diller at the beauty shop saying "just make me beautiful"?
Ron N
List-- this was supposed to go to me.
Dale Erwin
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/0d/f5/1f/09/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC