punching, it hits you

antares antares@euronet.nl
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:50:59 +0200


On 16-aug-04, at 2:30, Avery Todd wrote:

> Ric,
>
> Just curious. Is Andre referring to the backchecks being higher than 
> normal
> (2 mm below the hammer tail at let-off), or lower?


Hi Avery, there should be a 2 mm distance between the back check and 
the hammer tail. That is the very very best back check position.

greetings,
André Oorebeek
>
> Avery
>
>> This brings me to another one of Andre's suggestions... that about 
>> the height of the backcheck having an impact on tone.  Now this one 
>> is just plain weird sounding... I'll be the first to admit it... but 
>> there it was.  When Andre was up here a couple years back he 
>> demonstrated it to 5 of us, and no one could avoid admiting that he'd 
>> changed the tone... the openess of the tone on the notes he'd 
>> adjusted.  I asked the famous Japanese pianotechs Mr.  Ono and Mr. 
>> Takahara  about this too whilst I was in Japan this summer, and they 
>> both immediatly responded along the lines... "but of course-- didnt 
>> you know that ???"... tho to this day I have yet to find a 
>> satisfactory explaination for why the height of the backcheck can 
>> influence the openess of the tone of the piano.
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>
friendly greetings
from
André Oorebeek

Amsterdam -
The Netherlands

www.concertpianoservice.nl
www.grandpiano.nl

"where music is, no harm can be"


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC