punching, it hits you

Avery Todd avery@ev1.net
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:25:56 -0500


Thanks André,

See the private post I just sent to you.

Avery

At 02:50 PM 8/16/04, you wrote:

>On 16-aug-04, at 2:30, Avery Todd wrote:
>
>>Ric,
>>
>>Just curious. Is Andre referring to the backchecks being higher than normal
>>(2 mm below the hammer tail at let-off), or lower?
>
>
>Hi Avery, there should be a 2 mm distance between the back check and the 
>hammer tail. That is the very very best back check position.
>
>greetings,
>André Oorebeek
>>
>>Avery
>>
>>>This brings me to another one of Andre's suggestions... that about the 
>>>height of the backcheck having an impact on tone.  Now this one is just 
>>>plain weird sounding... I'll be the first to admit it... but there it 
>>>was.  When Andre was up here a couple years back he demonstrated it to 5 
>>>of us, and no one could avoid admiting that he'd changed the tone... the 
>>>openess of the tone on the notes he'd adjusted.  I asked the famous 
>>>Japanese pianotechs Mr.  Ono and Mr. Takahara  about this too whilst I 
>>>was in Japan this summer, and they both immediatly responded along the 
>>>lines... "but of course-- didnt you know that ???"... tho to this day I 
>>>have yet to find a satisfactory explaination for why the height of the 
>>>backcheck can influence the openess of the tone of the piano.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>>
>friendly greetings
>from
>André Oorebeek
>
>Amsterdam -
>The Netherlands
>
>www.concertpianoservice.nl
>www.grandpiano.nl
>
>"where music is, no harm can be"
>
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC